Key result
Among 3,247 patients clinically misdiagnosed with H1N1/2009, other respiratory pathogens were detected in 27.9% of samples, most commonly rhinovirus (8.9%).
Observational (n=3,247)
Clinical algorithms for H1N1/2009 during the 2009 outbreak frequently misdiagnosed common respiratory pathogens, highlighting the need for rapid, sensitive, and specific near-patient testing.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Clinical algorithms may misclassify common viruses as H1N1; hypothesis-generating for rapid multiplex testing in outbreaks.
BACKGROUND: During the April-July 2009 outbreak of H1N1/2009 in scotland the West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre (WoSSVC) in Glasgow tested > 16,000 clinical samples for H1N1/2009. Most were from patients clinically diagnosed with H1N1/2009. Out of these, 9% were positive. This study sought to determine what respiratory pathogens were misdiagnosed as cases of H1N1/2009 during this time. METHODS: We examined the results from 3247 samples which were sent to the laboratory during April-July 2009. All were from patients clinically diagnosed as having H1N1/2009 (based on accepted criteria) and all were given a full respiratory screen using real time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR) assays. RESULTS: In total, respiratory pathogens were detected in 27.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.3-29.5%) of the samples submitted. Numerous pathogens were detected, the most common of which were rhinovirus (8.9% (95% confidence interval, 7.9-9.9%)), parainfluenza 1 (1.9% (95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.4%)) and 3 (4.1% (95% confidence interval, 3.3-4.9%)), and adenovirus ((3.5% (95% confidence interval, 2.9-4.2%)). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the problems of using a clinical algorithm to detect H1N1/2009. Clinicians frequently misdiagnosed common respiratory pathogens as H1N1/2009 during the spring/summer outbreak in Scotland. Many undesirable consequences would have resulted, relating to treatment, infection control, and public health surveillance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gunson et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Clinically diagnosed H1N1/2009 (swine flu) (n=3,247). Clinical diagnosis of H1N1/2009 was evaluated on Detection of other respiratory pathogens (95% CI 26.3-29.5). Among 3,247 patients clinically misdiagnosed with H1N1/2009, other respiratory pathogens were detected in 27.9% of samples, most commonly rhinovirus (8.9%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: