Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We studied the validity of the aphasia item of a widely used stroke scale - the Scandinavian Stroke Scale (SSS) - in discriminating between aphasia and normal language function in 33 stroke patients of an acute stroke unit. They were assessed by a nurse using the aphasia item from the SSS and by a speech and language therapist carrying out a full evaluation of the language function. The latter served as the 'gold standard'. The agreement between the nurses' and the speech and language therapist's scoring was good (weighted kappa = 0.74, 95% CI 0.51-0.97), and the sensitivity and specificity of the SSS aphasia item were also satisfactory. However, the predictive value of a positive test was as low as 0.55 (95% CI 0.23-0.83), indicating nearly every second of the positives being false positive. Using the aphasia score of the SSS as a diagnostic aid for aphasia after stroke results in a high rate of false positives and inflates the prevalence figures for aphasia in epidemiological studies of stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thommessen et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: