Key result
Left bundle branch pacing was not significantly better than right ventricular septum pacing for short-term cardiac function in patients with pacemaker dependence and normal pre-operative LVEF.
Why the study?
The authors sought to compare left ventricular systolic function between left bundle branch pacing and right ventricular septum pacing in pacemaker-dependent patients using 3D speckle tracking imaging.
Does left bundle branch pacing improve left ventricular systolic function compared to right ventricular septum pacing in patients with pacemaker dependence?
Cohort (n=65)
Does left bundle branch pacing improve left ventricular systolic function compared to right ventricular septum pacing in patients with pacemaker dependence?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In patients with AV block and normal baseline LVEF, left bundle branch pacing does not significantly improve short-term left ventricular systolic function compared to right ventricular septum pacing.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the left ventricular systolic function between the 1eft bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and right ventricular septum pacing (RVSP) in patients with pacemaker dependence by three-dimensional speckle tracking imaging (3D-STI). METHODS: A total of 65 patients with atrioventricular block (AVB) (Mobitz type II second-degree AVB, high-degree AVB, or third-degree AVB), who underwent permanent cardiac pacing implantation including 32 patients receiving LBBP (LBBP group) and 33 patients receiving RVSP (RVSP group) from June 2018 to June 2019,were enrolled in this study. These patients met the following inclusion criterion: pre-operative left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)>50% and ventricular pacing rate>40% at 6-month programming follow-up; and the patients underwent echocardiography at pre-operation and 6 months after operation. The 3D-STI was used to obtain global longitudinal strain (GLS), global circumferential strain (GCS), global radial strain (GRS), and global area strain (GAS). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with pacemaker dependence and normal LVEF at pre-operation, the cardiac function in the LBBP group is not significantly better than that in the RVSP group in short term follow-up. But in terms of physiologic pacing and long-term cardiac function protection, the 1eft bundle branch pacing is an optimal pacing mode.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wen et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Atrioventricular block with pacemaker dependence (n=65). Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) vs. Right ventricular septum pacing (RVSP) was evaluated on Left ventricular systolic function (GLS, GCS, GRS, and GAS) (p=<0.05). Left bundle branch pacing was not significantly better than right ventricular septum pacing for short-term cardiac function in patients with pacemaker dependence and normal pre-operative LVEF.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: