Key result
LBBP is linked to improved tricuspid regurgitation vs RVP at 1-year follow-up.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of permanent left bundle branch pacing compared with traditional right ventricular pacing on left ventricular function.
Does permanent left bundle branch pacing improve left ventricular function and tricuspid regurgitation compared to traditional right ventricular pacing in patients receiving pacemaker implantation?
Cohort (n=78)
Does permanent left bundle branch pacing improve left ventricular function and tricuspid regurgitation compared to traditional right ventricular pacing in patients receiving pacemaker implantation?
p-value: p=0.016
Permanent left bundle branch pacing improves left ventricular dimensions and tricuspid regurgitation compared to traditional right ventricular pacing at 1-year follow-up.
LBBP was associated with TR improvement versus RVP; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the left ventricular function effects of permanent left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) versus traditional right ventricular pacing (RVP). Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients receiving pacemaker implantation were included and divided into left bundle branch block (LBBB) group and right ventricular pacing (RVP) group. Baseline characteristics were collected, and they received 1-year follow-up. Electrocardiogram (ECG) characteristics and pacing parameters were assessed before and after implantation. Cardiac function parameters such as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) were recorded and compared. Results: Of 78 patients included, 45 patients received LBBP (mean age, 72.7 ± 12.2 years; male, 55.6%) and 33 patients underwent RVP (mean age 72.9 ± 11.8 years; male, 63.6%). The pacing parameters were satisfactory during the implantation and remained stable during mid-term follow-up. During the follow-up period, LBBP patients had a greater decrease in LVEDD and LVESD. The TR in the LBBP group was significantly improved as compared to the RVP group ( P =0.016). Conclusion: Permanent LBBP achieves favorable cardiac hemodynamic effects with good stability and safety. LBBP may reduce severe TR at 1-year follow-up, and LBBP may be an option for patients with severe TR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Patients receiving pacemaker implantation (n=78). Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) vs. Right ventricular pacing (RVP) was evaluated on Cardiac function parameters including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) (p=0.016). Permanent left bundle branch pacing significantly improved tricuspid regurgitation compared to traditional right ventricular pacing at 1-year follow-up (P=0.016).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: