Why the study?
Does the measurement of activation markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis predict prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Does the measurement of activation markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis predict prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes?
Activation markers of coagulation and fibrinolysis have limited prognostic value for individual patients with acute coronary syndromes due to overlapping levels among different outcome groups.
Caution against individual ACS prognosis with activation markers; leaves open whether refined assays or combinations improve utility.
Several alterations of the coagulation, of the fibrinolysis and of inflammation are known in patients with acute coronary syndromes. To extent current knowledge of the pathophysiology and to optimize therapeutical strategies, the new molecular markers can be used in clinical studies. Furthermore, several studies were undertaken to assess the prognostic value of activation markers of these systems for patients with unstable angina pectoris and acute myocardial infarction with or without thrombolytic therapy. The majority of studies focussed on markers of thrombin activation, fibrinogen, fibrin degradation products and t-PA and its main inhibitor PAI-1. While there are stimulating results from larger studies, the value for prognosis for the individual patient still is limited by the overlap of patients with good versus a poor outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heller et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: