Why the study?
Does bifocal pacing improve haemodynamics compared to biventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay?
Does bifocal pacing improve haemodynamics compared to biventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay?
While bifocal pacing improves LV haemodynamics compared to baseline, biventricular pacing remains superior for patients with severe heart failure and intraventricular conduction delay.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BFP may modestly augment LV contractility versus baseline in severe HF with conduction delay; leaves open whether it approaches BVP benefit in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Bifocal pacing (BFP) has been proposed as a feasible alternative to cardiac resynchronization therapy. AIM: To evaluate BFP in patients with severe heart failure and significant intraventricular conduction delay and to compare it with biventricular pacing (BVP). METHODS: Echocardiographic examination including TDI and invasive measurement of haemodynamics was performed under basal conditions, during BFP and during BVP. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included: 29 with ischaemic heart disease (IHD), 21 with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (IDCM). LV dp/dt(max) increased during BFP compared to the basal state (13.4%, 95% CI 9.2-17.6%, p<0.0001) and a further increase was achieved during BVP (29.5%, 95% CI 23.7-35.4%, p<0.0001). A significant correlation was found between the distance of the right ventricular apical and outflow tract leads and percentage of dp/dt(max) increase in IDCM patients (r=0.72), but not in IHD patients. Interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD) decreased in BFP (43+/-22 ms vs. 53+/-31 ms, p=0.006), but BVP produced even shorter IVMD (22+/-19 ms, p<0.0001). In all patients, regional systolic contraction times were significantly shortened, corresponding with prolongation of the respective regional diastolic filling times during both BFP (p<0.05 for all segments) and BVP (p<0.001 for all segments). CONCLUSIONS: BFP improves LV haemodynamics by decreasing the inter- and intraventricular conduction delays. The leads in the right ventricle should be placed at the longest achievable distance. BVP is superior to BFP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bulava et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: