Why the study?
Dysfunctional breathing is challenging to diagnose due to its multidimensional nature, and the utility of the ventilatory equivalent for CO2 measured via cardiopulmonary exercise testing in its diagnosis needed exploration.
Does the measurement of the ventilatory equivalent for CO2 (VeqCO2) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing aid in the diagnosis of dysfunctional breathing?
Does the measurement of the ventilatory equivalent for CO2 (VeqCO2) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing aid in the diagnosis of dysfunctional breathing?
The ventilatory equivalent for CO2 (VeqCO2) measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a useful physiological parameter when incorporated into a broader diagnostic algorithm for dysfunctional breathing.
Dysfunctional breathing remains difficult to diagnose amid multi-dimensional breathlessness; leaves open standardized criteria and prospective validation studies.
Dysfunctional breathing refers to a multi-dimensional condition that is characterised by pathological changes in an individual's breathing. These changes lead to a feeling of breathlessness and include alterations in the biomechanical, psychological and physiological aspects of breathing. This makes dysfunctional breathing a hard condition to diagnose, given the diversity of aspects that contribute to the feeling of breathlessness. The disorder can debilitate individuals without any health problems, but may also be present in those with underlying cardiopulmonary co-morbidities. The ventilatory equivalent for CO 2 ( V eqCO 2 ) is a physiological parameter that can be measured using cardiopulmonary exercise testing. This review will explore how this single measurement can be used to aid the diagnosis of dysfunctional breathing. A background discussion about dysfunctional breathing will allow readers to comprehend its multidimensional aspects. This will then allow readers to understand how V eqCO 2 can be used in the wider diagnosis of dysfunctional breathing. Whilst V eqCO 2 cannot be used as a singular parameter in the diagnosis of dysfunctional breathing, this review supports its use within a broader algorithm to detect physiological abnormalities in patients with dysfunctional breathing. This will allow for more individuals to be accurately diagnosed and appropriately managed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Watson et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: