Why the study?
Tolvaptan decongestion may maintain renal function compared to furosemide, but its effect on AKI risk had not been investigated in ADHF patients with advanced CKD.
Does tolvaptan add-on treatment reduce acute kidney injury incidence compared to increased furosemide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and advanced chronic kidney disease?
Does tolvaptan add-on treatment reduce acute kidney injury incidence compared to increased furosemide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and advanced chronic kidney disease?
In patients with acute decompensated heart failure and advanced chronic kidney disease, adding tolvaptan is associated with a significantly lower risk of acute kidney injury compared to increasing the dose of furosemide.
Tolvaptan add-on may lower AKI risk versus increased furosemide in advanced CKD with ADHF; leaves open whether prospective trials should change practice.
INTRODUCTION: Furosemide, a loop diuretic, is often empirically used to treat acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) initially. Conversely, decongestion using tolvaptan, an aquaretic, is thought to maintain renal function compared to furosemide. However, it has not been investigated in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) at high risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to investigate AKI incidence using tolvaptan add-on treatment, compared to increased furosemide treatment for patients with ADHF complicated by advanced CKD. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <45 mL/min/1.73 m2) who developed ADHF under outpatient furosemide treatment. The exposure was set to tolvaptan add-on treatment, and the control was set to increased furosemide treatment. RESULTS: Of the 163 patients enrolled, 79 were in the tolvaptan group and 84 in the furosemide group. The mean age was 71.6 years, the percentage of males was 63.8%, the mean eGFR was 15.7 mL/min/1.73 m2, and patients with CKD stage G5 were 61.9%. AKI incidence was 17.7% in the tolvaptan group and 42.9% in the furosemide group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.34 [0.13-0.86], p = 0.023 in multivariate logistic regression analysis). Persistent AKI incidence was 11.8% in the tolvaptan group and 32.9% in the furosemide group (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.34 [0.10-1.06], p = 0.066 in the multinomial logit analysis). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that tolvaptan may be better than furosemide in patients with ADHF experiencing complicated advanced CKD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tagaya et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: