Why the study?
Although transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation is thought to increase central noradrenergic activity, findings supporting this mechanism are scarce and inconsistent.
Does continuous transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation modulate markers of noradrenergic activity in healthy participants?
Does continuous transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation modulate markers of noradrenergic activity in healthy participants?
Continuous transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation using standard parameters does not appear to increase central noradrenergic activity via a vagal pathway in healthy individuals.
No support for noradrenergic modulation by continuous taVNS; leaves open questions on mechanism and stimulation parameters.
Although transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is thought to increase central noradrenergic activity, findings supporting such mechanism are scarce and inconsistent. This study aimed to investigate whether taVNS modulates indirect markers of phasic and tonic noradrenergic activity. Sixty-six healthy participants performed a novelty auditory oddball task twice on separate days: once while receiving taVNS (left cymba concha), once during sham (left earlobe) stimulation. To maximize potential effects, the stimulation was delivered continuously (frequency: 25 Hz; width: 250 μs) at an intensity individually calibrated to the maximal level below pain threshold. The stimulation was administered 10 min before the oddball task and maintained throughout the session. Event-related pupil dilation (ERPD) to target stimuli and pre-stimulus baseline pupil size were assessed during the oddball task as markers of phasic and tonic noradrenergic activity, respectively. Prior to and at the end of stimulation, tonic pupil size at rest, cortisol, and salivary alpha-amylase were assessed as markers of tonic noradrenergic activity. Finally, we explored the effect of taVNS on cardiac vagal activity, respiratory rate, and salivary flow rate. Results showed a greater ERPD to both target and novelty compared to standard stimuli in the oddball task. In contrast to our hypotheses, taVNS did not impact any of the tested markers. Our findings strongly suggest that continuous stimulation of the cymba concha with the tested stimulation parameters is ineffective to increase noradrenergic activity via a vagal pathway.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Agostini et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: