Key result
taVNS fails to improve reversal learning or increase noradrenergic biomarkers compared to sham.
Why the study?
The effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on reversal learning and noradrenergic biomarkers including pupil size, cortisol, and salivary alpha-amylase were unclear.
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhance reversal learning and augment noradrenergic biomarkers in human participants?
RCT (n=71)
Does transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation enhance reversal learning and augment noradrenergic biomarkers in human participants?
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation did not enhance reversal learning or increase noradrenergic biomarkers, though exploratory analyses suggest it may decrease respiratory rate.
Does not support taVNS for reversal learning or noradrenergic augmentation; leaves open exploratory respiratory effects for confirmation.
This study investigated whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) enhances reversal learning and augments noradrenergic biomarkers (i.e., pupil size, cortisol, and salivary alpha-amylase [sAA]). We also explored the effect of taVNS on respiratory rate and cardiac vagal activity (CVA). Seventy-one participants received stimulation of either the cymba concha (taVNS) or the earlobe (sham) of the left ear. After learning a series of cue-outcome associations, the stimulation was applied before and throughout a reversal phase in which cue-outcome associations were changed for some (reversal), but not for other (distractor) cues. Tonic pupil size, salivary cortisol, sAA, respiratory rate, and CVA were assessed at different time points. Contrary to our hypothesis, taVNS was not associated with an overall improvement in performance on the reversal task. Compared to sham, the taVNS group performed worse for distractor than reversal cues. taVNS did not increase tonic pupil size and sAA. Only post hoc analyses indicated that the cortisol decline was steeper in the sham compared to the taVNS group. Exploratory analyses showed that taVNS decreased respiratory rate but did not affect CVA. The weak and unexpected effects found in this study might relate to the lack of parameters optimization for taVNS and invite to further investigate the effect of taVNS on cortisol and respiratory rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Agostini et al. (2021) reported an RCT. transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) vs. sham stimulation (earlobe) was evaluated on reversal learning performance and noradrenergic biomarkers (pupil size, cortisol, and salivary alpha-amylase). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation did not improve overall performance on a reversal learning task or increase tonic pupil size and salivary alpha-amylase compared to sham.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: