Why the study?
Most studies rely on single measurements of handgrip strength, leaving limited evidence regarding the association of its long-term trajectories with new-onset CVD risk.
Does an accelerated decline in handgrip strength increase the risk of new-onset cardiovascular disease in adults aged ≥50 years?
Does an accelerated decline in handgrip strength increase the risk of new-onset cardiovascular disease in adults aged ≥50 years?
Accelerated decline in handgrip strength over time is a significant predictor of new-onset cardiovascular disease in older adults, highlighting its potential utility as a simple, non-invasive risk marker.
May refine CVD risk prediction via handgrip trajectories in older adults; leaves open causality and intervention effects.
Background: Handgrip strength is an important indicator of overall health, yet most studies rely on single measurements. Evidence on its long-term trajectories and new-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk remains limited. This study examined associations of baseline handgrip strength and its trajectories with new-onset CVD in two aging cohorts. Methods: Data were from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) in the United States and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). Participants aged ≥50 years without baseline CVD were included. Handgrip strength across three waves was used to construct trajectories via group-based trajectory modeling. Cox regression assessed associations with new-onset CVD. Fine-Gray models, discrete-time logistic regression, restricted cubic splines, and mediation analysis (depression) were conducted. Results: A total of 4,984 (HRS) and 4,982 (ELSA) participants were included. Over median follow-ups of 10 and 12 years, 1,438 and 1,184 CVD events occurred, respectively. Higher baseline handgrip strength was associated with lower CVD risk (HRS: HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.73-0.86; ELSA: HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.76-0.91). Two trajectories were identified: accelerated decline and steady decline. Compared with steady decline, accelerated decline was linked to higher CVD risk (HRS: HR = 1.44, 95% CI: 1.22-1.70; ELSA: HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.08-1.58). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. A linear inverse association was observed, and depression partially mediated this relationship. Conclusion: Lower baseline handgrip strength and accelerated decline are associated with increased CVD risk. Longitudinal monitoring may aid early risk identification and prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: