Key result
A low stable grip strength trajectory was associated with a significantly higher risk of incident cardiovascular disease (HR 2.17) compared to a high stable trajectory.
Why the study?
Single measurements of grip strength predict CVD incidence, but long-term grip strength trajectories and their association with incident CVD are rarely studied.
Does a low stable grip strength trajectory increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease in community-dwelling adults?
Cohort (n=5,300)
Does a low stable grip strength trajectory increase the risk of incident cardiovascular disease in community-dwelling adults?
Hazard Ratio: 2.17 (95% CI 1.52–3.09)
Absolute Event Rate: 14.1% vs 5.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
A low stable grip strength trajectory over time is strongly associated with an increased risk of incident cardiovascular disease, suggesting its utility as a simple, non-invasive screening biomarker.
GS trajectories may refine long-term CVD risk assessment beyond single measures; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
Background: A single measurement of grip strength (GS) could predict the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the long-term pattern of GS and its association with incident CVD are rarely studied. We aimed to characterize the GS trajectory and determine its association with the incidence of CVD (myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, and heart failure). Methods: This study included 5,300 individuals without CVD from a British community-based cohort in 2012 (the baseline). GS was repeatedly measured in 2004, 2008, and 2012. Long-term GS patterns were identified by the group-based trajectory model. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the associations between GS trajectories and incident CVD. We identified three GS trajectories separately for men and women based on the 2012 GS measurement and change patterns during 2004–2012. Results: After a median follow-up of 6.1 years (during 2012–2019), 392 participants developed major CVD, including 114 myocardial infarction, 119 angina, 169 stroke, and 44 heart failure. Compared with the high stable group, participants with low stable GS was associated with a higher incidence of CVD incidence [hazards ratio (HR): 2.17; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.52–3.09; P <0.001], myocardial infarction (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.05–3.83; P = 0.035), stroke (HR: 1.96; 95% CI: 1.11–3.46; P = 0.020), and heart failure (HR: 6.91; 95% CI: 2.01–23.79; P = 0.002) in the fully adjusted models. Conclusions: The low GS trajectory pattern was associated with a higher risk of CVD. Continuous monitoring of GS values could help identify people at risk of CVD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Cardiovascular disease (n=5,300). Low stable grip strength trajectory vs. High stable grip strength trajectory was evaluated on Incidence of cardiovascular disease (composite of myocardial infarction, angina, stroke, and heart failure) (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.52-3.09, p=<0.001). A low stable grip strength trajectory was associated with a significantly higher risk of incident cardiovascular disease (HR 2.17) compared to a high stable trajectory.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: