Why the study?
Although abnormal coagulation indices like elevated D-dimer have prognostic significance in acute decompensated or compatible heart failure, the impact of D-dimer on outcomes in end-stage heart failure remained unclear.
Does elevated D-dimer level predict all-cause mortality in patients with end-stage heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Does elevated D-dimer level predict all-cause mortality in patients with end-stage heart failure secondary to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy?
Elevated D-dimer levels serve as an independent prognostic marker for poor long-term outcomes in patients with end-stage heart failure due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy.
Elevated D-dimer signals higher risk in end-stage DCM HF; leaves open incremental prognostic value and need for prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Previous studies had demonstrated hemostatic abnormalities in patients with heart failure (HF) and several studies have shown that abnormal coagulation indices, represented by elevated D-dimer, had prognostic significance in patients with compatible or acute decompensated HF. However, the impact of D-dimer on the outcome in patients with end-stage HF remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 244 consecutive patients with end-stage HF due to idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) were prospectively enrolled from February 2011 to September 2014. D-dimer levels were measured and its prognostic value was assessed. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality during the follow-up period. Secondary endpoints were stroke, bleeding, occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). RESULTS: = 0.009), and the predictive value was independent of age, sex, atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation status. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated D-dimer level was independently associated with poor long-term outcome in patients with end-stage HF secondary to idiopathic DCM, and the predictive value was superior to that of traditional prognostic markers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: