Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To estimate the rate of Human Papillomavirus among pregnant women and its impact on the pregnancy outcomes. Study design:This was a retrospective cohort study of women who sought prenatal care and later delivered at the Nebraska Medical Center from 2012-2014.Human Papillomavirus infection was based on a cytological cervicovaginal diagnosis (Pap test) report.Bivariate and multivariable analyzes were performed using SAS 9.3.Results: Of the total sample size of 4824 women, 221 (4.4%) were HPV-positive.Women with Human Papillomavirus infection had increased risk of preeclampsia (adjusted OR: 2.83 95% CI: 1.28-6.26)and were also 1.8 times more likely to deliver preterm compared to women with no Human Papillomavirus infection (adjusted OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.15-2.83).Additionally, Human Papillomavirus infection was found to be significantly associated with low birth weight (adjusted OR: 2.58; 95% CI: 1.56-4.27). Conclusions:Although the prevalence of Human Papillomavirus infection was relatively low in this sample, the study clearly indicated a positive association between Human Papillomavirus infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes.Further research is needed to understand the impact of Human Papillomavirus infection in a larger and diverse sample of women.Also, a closer follow-up of pregnant women affected by Human Papillomavirus infection may be warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harpriya Kaur (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: