Why the study?
Does outpatient cardiac MRI with LGE establish a definitive diagnosis in patients with troponin-positive chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries?
Does outpatient cardiac MRI with LGE establish a definitive diagnosis in patients with troponin-positive chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries?
Outpatient LGE-CMRI is useful for differentiating true NSTEMI from myocarditis or normal findings in patients with troponin-positive chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries.
May aid differentiation of causes in troponin-positive chest pain with unobstructed arteries; leaves open prospective validation before routine use.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the outcome of cardiac MRI (CMRI) with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) at outpatient follow-up in a consecutive series of patients with troponin-positive chest pain but unobstructed coronary arteries at the index admission. METHODS: The study group comprised 91 consecutive patients who presented to our institution with cardiac chest pain, elevated troponin I and unobstructed coronary arteries on coronary angiography. All patients underwent an outpatient CMRI with LGE imaging in order to establish a definitive diagnosis. RESULTS: The average time from coronary angiography to LGE-CMRI was 2 months. 73% of patients had no abnormality on their LGE-CMRI, 16% of patients had patchy late enhancement consistent with myocarditis and 11% had focal subendocardial or full thickness late enhancement consistent with myocardial infarction. There were no deaths in this cohort during a mean follow-up of 21 months. CONCLUSION: LGE-CMRI is a useful tool for establishing whether such patients have definitive evidence of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), and can make an important contribution to the long-term management strategy of these patients as an inappropriate diagnosis of NSTEMI carries important medical, social and financial implications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmoudi et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: