Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
(V13, H77, and F80). RUFI also significantly decreased the proteolytic capabilities of the ClpC1/P1/P2 complex to degrade casein, while having no significant effect on the ATPase activity of ClpC1. This represents a marked difference from ecumicin, which inhibits ClpC1 proteolysis but stimulates the ATPase activity, thereby providing evidence that although these peptides share ClpC1 as a macromolecular target, their downstream effects are distinct, likely due to differences in binding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choules et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: