Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An electrostatic discharge (ESD) evaluation of a silicided 0.25 μm complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology is carried out by HBM, CDM, and TLP tests. Good ESD hardness and device performance are obtained by using retrograde-like well profiles. It is shown that devices with minimum gate length do not necessarily give the best ESD-results. This is due to a difference in failure mechanism between the shortest and the longer channel devices and possibly by a more homogeneous snapback of the slightly longer devices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bock et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: