Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A review of 10,000 consecutive frozen section consultations performed over a 6½-year period was undertaken in order to assess the accuracy of the method and to develop a quality-control mechanism. Frozen section interpretations of specimens of lung, tumors of skin, thyroid, parathyroid, and tissues from the female genital tract were in error in about 1.5% of the cases. Specimens from the gastrointestinal system, otorhinolaryngologic regions, lymph nodes, central nervous system, and pancreas were incorrectly interpreted in fewer than 3% of instances. A system of periodic review of cases is suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holaday et al. (1974) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: