Why the study?
Does time domain heart rate variability analysis detect preclinical cardiac involvement in patients with thalassaemia major compared to healthy subjects?
Does time domain heart rate variability analysis detect preclinical cardiac involvement in patients with thalassaemia major compared to healthy subjects?
Time domain heart rate variability parameters are significantly reduced in patients with thalassaemia major, suggesting its potential utility in detecting preclinical cardiac autonomic dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports HRV for preclinical autonomic assessment in thalassemia major; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: Cardiac complication is one of the major causes of death in patients with thalassaemia major. Heart rate variability is a non-invasive index of neuronal modulation of heart rate. In this study, autonomic functions of the heart in a preclinical stage of heart disease were evaluated in 48 thalassaemic patients with time domain heart rate variability analysis; the control group consisted of 45 healthy subjects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mean RR time in the study and control group was 0.73 +/- 0.1, and 0.82 +/- 0.1 ms respectively (p < 0.001). In the study group; SDNN, SDNN-i, SDANN-i, RMSSD, and PNN50 were found to be 167.4 +/- 86.2 ms, 153.9 +/- 108.1 ms, 111.4 +/- 60.4 ms, 108.9 +/- 86.7 ms, and 14.5 +/- 13.4%, respectively. Time domain parameters were significantly lower in the study group than the control group (p < 0.00 1). There was a significant positive correlation between the mean RR time and SDNN, SDNN-i, SDANN-i, RMSSD, and PNN50 (for the RMSSD p < 0.05, r = 0.31; for the others p = 0.000, and r values were 0.65, 0.65, 0.38, 0.37 for the SDNN, SDNN-i, SDANN-i, and PNN50, respectively). CONCLUSION: The analysis of heart rate variability might be helpful to detect cardiac complications in the preclinical stage of the cardiac involvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gürses et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: