Why the study?
Decreasing the incidence of uncontrolled hypertension is a priority, and early identification of at-risk patients would enable targeted, proactive treatments.
Do machine learning models improve the prediction of uncontrolled hypertension compared to using the last blood pressure measurement alone?
Do machine learning models improve the prediction of uncontrolled hypertension compared to using the last blood pressure measurement alone?
Machine learning models, including simple logistic regression, can identify patients at risk of uncontrolled hypertension using EHR data better than relying on the last blood pressure measurement alone.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
ML models may enable early identification of uncontrolled hypertension risk; leaves open whether they improve outcomes in prospective use.
Hypertension is a major risk factor for stroke, cardiovascular disease, and end-stage renal disease, and its prevalence is expected to rise dramatically. Effective hypertension management is thus critical. A particular priority is decreasing the incidence of uncontrolled hypertension. Early identification of patients at risk for uncontrolled hypertension would allow targeted use of personalized, proactive treatments. We develop machine learning models (logistic regression and recurrent neural networks) to stratify patients with respect to the risk of exhibiting uncontrolled hypertension within the coming three-month period. We trained and tested models using EHR data from 14,407 and 3,009 patients, respectively. The best model achieved an AUROC of 0.719, outperforming the simple, competitive baseline of relying prediction based on the last BP measure alone (0.634). Perhaps surprisingly, recurrent neural networks did not outperform a simple logistic regression for this task, suggesting that linear models should be included as strong baselines for predictive tasks using EHR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammadi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: