Why the study?
Does 60-Hz alternating current induce ventricular fibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles?
Does 60-Hz alternating current induce ventricular fibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles?
60-Hz alternating current can capture the ventricle at strengths lower than regular pacing thresholds, potentially precipitating VF through fast ventricular rates and steep restitution curves.
AC exposure may risk VF at low amplitudes in vulnerable hearts; leaves open human translation and safety thresholds.
BACKGROUND: The mechanisms by which 60-Hz alternating current (AC) can induce ventricular fibrillation (VF) are unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 7 isolated perfused swine right ventricles in vitro. The action potential duration restitution curve was determined. Optical mapping techniques were used to determine the patterns of activation on the epicardium during 5-second 60-Hz AC stimulation (10 to 999 microA). AC captured the right ventricles at 100+/-65 microA, which is significantly lower than the direct current pacing threshold (0.77+/-0.45 mA, P:<0.05). AC induced ventricular tachycardia or VF at 477+/-266 microA, when the stimulated responses to AC had (1) short activation CLs (128+/-14 ms), (2) short diastolic intervals (16+/-9 ms), and (3) short diastolic intervals associated with a steep action potential duration restitution curve. Optical mapping studies showed that during rapid ventricular stimulation by AC, a wave front might encounter the refractory tail of an earlier wave front, resulting in the formation of a wave break and VF. Computer simulations reproduced these results. CONCLUSIONS: AC at strengths less than the regular pacing threshold can capture the ventricle at fast rates. Accidental AC leak to the ventricles could precipitate VF and sudden death if AC results in a fast ventricular rate coupled with a steep restitution curve and a nonuniform recovery of excitability of the myocardium.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Voroshilovsky et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: