Why the study?
Does a spontaneous Type 1 electrocardiogram pattern in lead V2 predict ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome?
Does a spontaneous Type 1 electrocardiogram pattern in lead V2 predict ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome?
A spontaneous Type 1 ECG pattern in lead V2 is an independent predictor of ventricular fibrillation in patients with Brugada syndrome, which may aid in risk stratification.
May support refined Brugada VF risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
AIM: Risk stratification for Brugada syndrome remains controversial. We investigated the relationships between episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and various clinical, electrocardiographic, electrophysiologic, and genetic parameters both retrospectively and prospectively. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two patients with Brugada syndrome (49 men, average age 42 +/- 3 years) were studied. In the Brugada patients with a VF history, the frequency of a spontaneous Type 1 electrocardiogram (ECG) pattern in lead V2 was significantly higher and the STJ amplitude in the V1 and V2 leads was also higher than in those without a VF history. Multivariate analyses revealed that the spontaneous Type 1 ECG pattern in lead V2 (but not lead V1) was the only independent predictor of a VF history. During a mean follow-up period of 39 +/- 4 months, 38.8% of the patients with a VF history and 2.9% of those without experienced an appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillation owing to VF. A multivariate analysis using a Cox's proportional hazard model showed that a VF history and spontaneous Type 1 ECG pattern in lead V2 were independent predictors of subsequent VF events. CONCLUSION: A spontaneous Type 1 Brugada ECG pattern in lead V2 (but not lead V1) was both a prospective and retrospective independent predictor of VF episodes in Brugada syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakano et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: