Why the study?
Does ramipril compared to losartan improve haemodynamic responses to L-arginine in uncomplicated Type 1 diabetic patients?
Does ramipril compared to losartan improve haemodynamic responses to L-arginine in uncomplicated Type 1 diabetic patients?
ACE inhibitors, but not ARBs, enhance L-arginine-induced renal vasodilation in uncomplicated Type 1 diabetes, potentially through NO-independent mechanisms.
Ramipril, unlike losartan, enhances L-arginine-induced renal vasodilation in type 1 diabetes; extends evidence distinguishing ACE inhibitor versus ARB renal effects.
INTRODUCTION: Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to improve endothelial function in Type 1 diabetes. However, the potential of ACE inhibitors (ACE-I) to enhance the haemodynamic effects of L-arginine (L-arg), the precursor of nitric oxide (NO), has not been evaluated. Furthermore, angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), another group of inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), have not been studied in this context. METHODS: Using a randomised, crossover design, the acute effects of L-arg (200 mg/kg) on blood pressure (BP) and renal haemodynamics were determined in uncomplicated Type 1 diabetic patients before and after three weeks of treatment with the ACE-I ramipril (5 mg/day) or the ARB losartan (50 mg/day). RESULTS: L-arg alone did not influence BP or renal haemodynamics. BP responses to L-arg were not modulated by ACE-I or ARB. In contrast to the systemic responses, L-arg induced significant renal vasodilation after treatment with ramipril (p<0.05). Unlike ramipril, losartan did not modulate renal haemodynamic responses to L-arg. L-arg administration was paralleled by increments in plasma L-citrulline levels, determined as a measure of L-arg-induced systemic NO production. These responses were not influenced by RAS inhibitors. No changes in other indicators of the systemic and renal NO production, such as plasma and urinary nitrates/nitrites, were detected in response to L-arg alone or after treatment with RAS inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: ACE-Is have greater potential than ARBs to enhance L-arg effects in the kidney in uncomplicated Type 1 diabetes. Neither RAS inhibitor influenced the systemic effects of L-arg. The lack of changes in renal NO indicators parallelling the haemodynamic responses, suggests that the effects of ACE-I on L-arg-induced renal haemodynamic changes could be also attributable to NO-independent mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komers et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: