Why the study?
Although the blood-pressure-lowering role of aliskiren is recognized, its safety and tolerability remain controversial.
What is the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aliskiren monotherapy based on published meta-analyses?
What is the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aliskiren monotherapy based on published meta-analyses?
This protocol outlines an umbrella review to systematically summarize the clinical efficacy and side effects of aliskiren monotherapy.
Aliskiren monotherapy safety and efficacy remain uncertain; this protocol for umbrella review leaves open definitive conclusions.
INTRODUCTION: Aliskiren is a newly developed medicine. As one of the effective renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors, its role in lowering blood pressure has been recognised. However, its safety and tolerability still remain controversial. The aim of the paper is to systematically summarise the published studies about the clinical efficacy and side effects of aliskiren monotherapy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A comprehensive review of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases published from inception until June 2019 will be conducted. The selected articles are meta-analyses that integrated the randomised controlled studies, which evaluated efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren monotherapy. Two people will select eligible articles and extract data independently. Any disputes will be resolved by discussion or the arbitration of a third person. The quality of reporting evidence will be assessed using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Study selection process will be presented using a flowchart. We will re-analyse each outcome with the random effect methods if necessary. If possible, we will also calculate 95% prediction intervals for each random effect estimate, by using Egger's test to evaluate if the reporting bias existed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for the study, as we only collected data from available published materials. This umbrella review will be also submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication after completion. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142141.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhao et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: