Why the study?
To assess the reproducibility in a different database of previously observed results on the risk of severe stroke among NVAF patients treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin.
Does rivaroxaban reduce the risk of stroke compared to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
Does rivaroxaban reduce the risk of stroke compared to warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation?
In a real-world cohort of NVAF patients, rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of overall, minor, moderate, and severe stroke compared to warfarin.
Supports reproducibility of rivaroxaban benefit in NVAF across databases; leaves open need for prospective confirmation.
OBJECTIVES: In a previous real-world study, rivaroxaban reduced the risk of stroke overall and severe stroke compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility in a different database of our previously observed results (Alberts M, et al. Stroke. 2020;51:549-555) on the risk of severe stroke among NVAF patients in a different population treated with rivaroxaban or warfarin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: -VASc score ≥2, and had no history of stroke or anticoagulant use. Patient data were assessed until the earliest occurrence of a primary inpatient diagnosis of stroke, death, end of health plan enrollment, or end of study. Stroke severity was defined by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, imputed by random forest model. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to compare risk of stroke between cohorts, balanced by inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: The mean observation period from index date to either stroke, or end of eligibility or end of data was 28 months. Data from 13,599 rivaroxaban and 39,861 warfarin patients were included. Stroke occurred in 272 rivaroxaban-treated patients (0.97/100 person-years [PY]) and 1,303 warfarin-treated patients (1.32/100 PY). Rivaroxaban patients had lower risk for stroke overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-0.88) and for minor (NIHSS 1 to <5; HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93), moderate (NIHSS 5 to <16; HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99), and severe stroke (NIHSS 16 to 42; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study in a larger population of NVAF patients align with previous real-world findings and the ROCKET-AF trial by showing improved stroke prevention with rivaroxaban versus warfarin across all stroke severities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Milentijevic et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: