Why the study?
Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately measure left ventricular volumes and cardiac output compared to the indicator dilution technique in patients with varying left ventricular function?
Does magnetic resonance imaging accurately measure left ventricular volumes and cardiac output compared to the indicator dilution technique in patients with varying left ventricular function?
Multislice MRI is a reliable method for determining left ventricular volumes and cardiac output compared to classical indicator dilution techniques.
Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were determined in 17 patients with different levels of left ventricular function by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A 1.5 Tesla Magnet was used obtaining ECG triggered single and multiple slices. Calculated cardiac outputs were compared with those measured simultaneously by a classical physiological indicator dilution technique. There was good agreement between cardiac output as measured by MRI and the indicator dilution method, when the multislice technique was used (r = 0.87, p less than 0.001). A poor correlation between the two methods was seen when the single slice technique was used (r = 0.06, p greater than 0.80). The results indicate that MRI is a reliable method for left ventricular volume determination when the multislice technique is used.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Møgelvang et al. (1986) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: