Why the study?
Does temporary vena caval filtration prevent pulmonary embolism in high-risk patients with recent venous thromboembolism and short-term contraindication to anticoagulation?
Does temporary vena caval filtration prevent pulmonary embolism in high-risk patients with recent venous thromboembolism and short-term contraindication to anticoagulation?
Temporary vena caval filtration using a retrievable device appears safe and effective for preventing pulmonary embolism during short-term discontinuation of anticoagulation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support short-term IVC filter use in select patients; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
Removable vena caval devices look attractive in order to prevent pulmonary embolism (PE) in high risk patients when anticoagulant therapy has to be discontinued for periods shorter than 14 days. We describe our preliminary experience about 10 consecutive patients. All patients were anticoagulated for recent venous thromboembolism and the indication of vena caval filtration was mainly a short-term contraindication to anticoagulation due to surgery (8 cases) or delivery (1 case). Gunther Tulip retrievable vena caval device was used. No clinical manifestation of PE occurred during the filtration period. No thrombosis was detected at the insertion site, nor was any filter thrombosis found at the time of retrieval. Eight out of ten filters were easily retrieved through internal jugular vein. In one patient, filter could not be removed due to device tilting; in two patients, permanent filtration was secondarily requested. These results suggest that temporary vena caval filtration is efficient and safe for preventing pulmonary embolism during a short-term discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy in high risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ponchon et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: