Why the study?
Does dermatan sulphate prevent deep vein thrombosis in patients with hip fracture?
Does dermatan sulphate prevent deep vein thrombosis in patients with hip fracture?
Dermatan sulphate (300 mg IM twice daily) significantly reduces the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in patients with hip fracture without increasing bleeding risk.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports dermatan sulphate for DVT prevention in hip fracture; extends evidence for glycosaminoglycan prophylaxis in orthopedic patients.
Dermatan sulphate (MF 701) is a natural glycosaminoglycan that catalyses thrombin inhibition by heparin cofactor II. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MF 701 for prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with hip fracture. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design was used to assess two dose regimens of MF 701 in two consecutive study phases. Treatment was started within 48 h from the trauma and continued for 14 days for non-operated patients or until the 10th postoperative day. Bilateral mandatory venography was used to assess the end-point. Eighty patients were included in the first phase (40 MF 701, 40 placebo). MF 701, 100 mg IM b.i.d., did not reduce incidence of DVT from that on placebo and did not induce any bleeding. In the second phase 126 patients were included, with a randomisation ratio of 2:1 (84 MF 701, 300 mg IM b.i.d., 42 placebo). Bilateral venography was obtained for 110 patients. The incidence of DVT was 64% (23/36) in the placebo group and 38% (28/74) in the MF 701 group (p = 0.01; odds ratio [OR] = 0.34, 95% confidence limits [CL] = 0.15-0.80p; proximal DVTs were 42% (15/36) and 20% (15/74), respectively (p = 0.02; OR = 0.36, CL = 0.15-0.89). No significant differences were found in haemorrhagic complications (2.4% in each group), blood loss from drains, blood transfusions, haemoglobin and haematocrit values. This study is the first demonstration that dermatan sulphate is a clinically effective antithrombotic agent without bleeding effects. It also provides evidence of the biological role of heparin cofactor II.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agnelli et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: