Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) obtained using a high b-value (2,000 s/mm2) is superior to that using a standard b-value (1,000 s/mm2) for discriminating malignant from normal peripheral tissue in the prostate. METHODS: Twenty-six patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent 1.5T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging including single-shot, echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with repetition time/echo time, 3500/88 ms; 4-mm slice thickness; 1-mm interslice gap; 144x128 matrix; field of view, 250x250 mm; number of excitations, 10; and b-values, 0, 1,000, and 2,000 s/mm2. For each patient, ADC values were obtained for malignant and normal tissue using b=1,000 and 2,000 in a monoexponential model. Signal-to-noise (SNR) and contrast-to-noise (CNR) ratios in DWI were also evaluated. RESULTS: At b=1,000, the mean ADC (x10(-3) mm2/s) for malignant tissue was 0.82+/-0.27 (range 0.43-1.29) and for normal tissue, 1.69+/-0.23 (1.31-2.18). At b=2000, the mean ADC for malignant tissue was 0.61+/-0.19 (0.30-0.94) and for normal tissue, 1.01+/-0.14 (0.73-1.35). Significant ADC overlap between the malignant and normal tissue was recognized at b=2000. As b-value increased, the mean SNR within malignant tissue decreased by 21.6%, and mean CNR decreased 17.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Under the same imaging conditions, measuring ADC using a high b-value (2,000 s/mm2) in a monoexponential model has little diagnostic advantage over using the standard b-value (1,000 s/mm2) in discriminating malignant from normal prostate tissue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitajima et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: