Why the study?
Does oral ephedrine improve completely dissociated auricle and ventricle in a patient with severe Adams-Stokes disease?
Does oral ephedrine improve completely dissociated auricle and ventricle in a patient with severe Adams-Stokes disease?
This historical case report describes the rationale for using oral ephedrine to treat severe Adams-Stokes syndrome due to its prolonged action compared to epinephrine.
Should not yet change practice in Adams-Stokes syndrome; leaves open prospective validation of oral ephedrine.
Epinephrine has been used with success to abolish the temporary ventricular standstill of Adams-Stokes syndrome. 1 The transient nature of its action and the necessity for subcutaneous administration represent two palpable objections to this drug. Ephedrine largely overcomes both of these difficulties, as it exhibits an epinephrine-like action over a more prolonged period and may be administered orally. These considerations and three favorable case reports in the literature 2 led to the use of ephedrine in the instance of severe Adams-Stokes disease subsequently described. Although a surprising amount of data 3 relative to the action of ephedrine on the circulatory system has accumulated in recent years, remarkably little has been made of the opportunity to observe the action of this drug on the completely dissociated auricle and ventricle in cases of human heart block. Miller 4 made electrocardiographic observations in a case of human heart block and recorded an increase
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
J. Edwin Wood (1932) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: