This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Scedosporium prolificans is a truly emerging fungal pathogen. It has only been recognized as a human pathogen for 22 years and has been related with numerous infections in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients. A search for cases in the literature was performed and a database was constructed. Cases were reviewed in order to analyse the epidemiology and outcome of infection. A total of 162 cases were included. The median age of patients was 45 years (ranging from a few months to 81 years), and 102 (63%) infections were diagnosed in males. Risk factors for scedosporiosis were malignancy, 74/162 (45.7%), cystic fibrosis, 19/172 (11.7%), and solid organ transplantation 14/162 (8.6%). The most common clinical presentations were disseminated infection, 72/162 cases (44.4%), pulmonary mycosis, 47/162 (29%), and bone and joint infections, 17/162 (10.4%). All disseminated infections afflicted patents with underlying diseases, primarily haematological malignancies (57/72 [80%]). Blood cultures were positive in 70% of patients suffering from disseminated mycosis. Neutropenia, fever and cerebral symptoms were independently related to the development of disseminated infection whereas recovery from aplasia was associated with a reduced risk. The overall mortality was 46.9% but mortality rate was 87.5% in patients with disseminated disease. Survival was independently associated with surgical excision and recovery from aplasia. Antifungal treatments were not related to a reduced risk of death. Infections caused by S. prolificans are life threatening in susceptible patients, and can be considered a truly emerging disease. Infections are difficult to treat since it is a multi-resistant species. Multicenter studies are essential with the aim of developing and disseminating appropriate techniques and protocols to treat this mycosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rodrı́guez-Tudela et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: