Key result
Appropriate thromboprophylaxis use in high-risk elderly patients had higher in-hospital bleeding than inappropriate use in low-risk patients (11.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.009), with no VTE difference.
Why the study?
Appropriate prescribing of thromboprophylaxis per guidelines can heighten over- or underutilization risk, motivating evaluation of its safety and effectiveness in hospitalized elderly medical patients.
Does guideline-appropriate thromboprophylaxis compared to inappropriate thromboprophylaxis affect in-hospital bleeding, VTE incidence, and 90-day mortality in hospitalized elderly medical patients?
Cohort (n=370)
No
Does guideline-appropriate thromboprophylaxis compared to inappropriate thromboprophylaxis affect in-hospital bleeding, VTE incidence, and 90-day mortality in hospitalized elderly medical patients?
In hospitalized elderly medical patients, guideline compliance for high-risk VTE patients was high, and overutilization of thromboprophylaxis in low-VTE-risk patients was associated with a low bleeding rate (2.9%), whereas older, higher-risk patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis experienced significant bleeding (11.7%).
Appropriate thromboprophylaxis in high-risk elderly was associated with more bleeding without VTE reduction; leaves open net benefit of guideline-directed use in this population.
Appropriate prescribing of thromboprophylaxis according to guidelines’ recommendations can heighten over- or underutilization risk. The study intended to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of appropriate/inappropriate thromboprophylaxis use among hospitalized elderly medical patients. A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted, including patients who were ≥60 years old, hospitalized for an acute medical illness that required hospitalization in a medical ward for >48 h, and received thromboprophylaxis. Against the American College of Chest Physicians guidelines, the thromboprophylaxis use appropriateness was assessed. A total of 370 patients met the inclusion criteria, in 71.9% of whom thromboprophylaxis use was appropriate. The mean age of the included patients was 75 years (±9.1), and 72.4% of them were at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and almost all these patients received appropriate thromboprophylaxis. The occurrence of bleeding was significantly higher in the appropriate use group during hospitalization than the inappropriate use group (11.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.009); the majority of these bleeding events were classified as major. There were no differences in VTE events during hospitalization or 90 days all-cause mortality between the two groups. The study demonstrates high prescribers’ compliance with recommendations in high-risk patients. In patients at low risk for VTE, the overutilization of thromboprophylaxis did not increase their bleeding risk. This study suggests that the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in elderly patients, regardless of their VTE risk, may outweigh the risk of bleeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korayem et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Hospitalized elderly medical patients receiving thromboprophylaxis (n=370). Appropriate thromboprophylaxis use (per ACCP 9th edition guidelines and Padua prediction score ≥4) vs. Inappropriate thromboprophylaxis use (predominantly low-risk patients with Padua score <4 who received thromboprophylaxis) was evaluated on Bleeding events during hospitalization (p=0.009). Appropriate thromboprophylaxis use in high-risk elderly patients had higher in-hospital bleeding than inappropriate use in low-risk patients (11.7% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.009), with no VTE difference.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: