Key result
Increasing arterial wall curvature from 0 to 120 degrees significantly decreased computed fractional flow reserve by 5%, 8%, and 20% in 70%, 80%, and 90% area stenoses, respectively.
Why the study?
Does arterial wall curvature affect the non-invasive assessment of stenosis severity using FFR, CDP, and LFC in computational models?
Population
Computational simulation models of hyperemic blood flow in arteries with 70%, 80%, and 90% area stenoses
Comparison
Curved arterial wall models vs Straight arterial wall model (0° angle)
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Arterial curvature may artifactually lower computed FFR; leaves open relevance to invasive measurements or revascularization decisions.
Does arterial wall curvature affect the non-invasive assessment of stenosis severity using FFR, CDP, and LFC in computational models?
p-value: p=<0.05
Arterial wall curvature significantly alters FFR, CDP, and LFC in computational models, indicating that curvature should be considered in non-invasive stenosis assessment to prevent misjudgment of intermediate lesions.
Govindaraju et al. (2016) studied Coronary artery stenosis. Arterial wall curvature vs. Straight artery (0 degrees curvature) was evaluated on Fractional flow reserve (FFR) (p=<0.05). Increasing arterial wall curvature from 0 to 120 degrees significantly decreased computed fractional flow reserve by 5%, 8%, and 20% in 70%, 80%, and 90% area stenoses, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: