Key result
Artery wall curvature significantly decreased FFR compared to straight models, with the clinical FFR cutoff of 0.8 observed at 81.98% and 79.10% area stenosis for 0° and 120° curvatures, respectively.
Why the study?
Does artery wall curvature influence the anatomical assessment of stenosis severity derived from fractional flow reserve?
Does artery wall curvature influence the anatomical assessment of stenosis severity derived from fractional flow reserve?
Artery wall curvature significantly influences FFR, suggesting that anatomical assessment alone (like minimum lumen area or per cent area stenosis) may underestimate functionally significant stenosis in curved arteries.
Curvature may alter FFR thresholds in tortuous vessels; leaves open validation in patient-specific clinical models.
This study aims to investigate the influence of artery wall curvature on the anatomical assessment of stenosis severity and to identify a region of misinterpretation in the assessment of per cent area stenosis (AS) for functionally significant stenosis using fractional flow reserve (FFR) as standard. Five artery models of different per cent AS severity (70, 75, 80, 85 and 90%) were considered. For each per cent AS severity, the angle of curvature of the arterial wall varied from straight to an increasingly curved model (0°, 30°, 60°, 90° and 120°). Computational fluid dynamics was performed under transient physiologic hyperemic flow conditions to investigate the influence of artery wall curvature on the pressure drop and the FFR. The findings in this study may be useful in in vitro anatomical assessment of functionally significant stenosis. The FFR decreased with increasing stenosis severity for a given curvature of the artery wall. Moreover, a significant decrease in FFR was found between straight and curved models discussed for a given severity condition. These findings indicate that the curvature effect was included in the FFR assessment in contrast to minimum lumen area (MLA) or per cent AS assessment. The MLA or per cent AS assessment may lead to underestimation of stenosis severity. From this numerical study, an uncertainty region could be evaluated using the clinical FFR cutoff value of 0.8. This value was observed at 81.98 and 79.10% AS for arteries with curvature angles of 0° and 120° respectively. In conclusion, the curvature of the artery should not be neglected in in vitro anatomical assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Govindaraju et al. (2016) studied Coronary artery stenosis (n=5). Artery wall curvature vs. Straight artery models (0° curvature) was evaluated on Fractional flow reserve (FFR). Artery wall curvature significantly decreased FFR compared to straight models, with the clinical FFR cutoff of 0.8 observed at 81.98% and 79.10% area stenosis for 0° and 120° curvatures, respectively.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: