Key result
3D electroanatomical mapping to guide conduction system pacing in difficult anatomical scenarios achieved a procedural success rate of 86% (37/43 patients) with no procedural complications.
Why the study?
Conduction system pacing is limited by technical challenges in difficult anatomies, but 3D electroanatomical mapping can support it by ensuring high electro-anatomical precision and low fluoroscopy.
Does 3D electroanatomical mapping (3D-EAM) effectively guide conduction system pacing (CSP) in patients with difficult cardiac anatomies?
Observational (n=43)
Does 3D electroanatomical mapping (3D-EAM) effectively guide conduction system pacing (CSP) in patients with difficult cardiac anatomies?
3D electroanatomical mapping is a feasible and effective method to guide conduction system pacing in patients with complex cardiac anatomies, achieving an 86% success rate with low fluoroscopy times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May aid CSP in complex anatomies; leaves open need for RCTs to confirm outcomes.
Marcantoni et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Conduction disease with difficult cardiac anatomies (n=43). 3D electroanatomical mapping-guided conduction system pacing was evaluated on Procedural success. 3D electroanatomical mapping to guide conduction system pacing in difficult anatomical scenarios achieved a procedural success rate of 86% (37/43 patients) with no procedural complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: