Key result
Multidetector-row computed tomography accurately estimated regional and global cardiac function, showing better correlation with left ventriculography than quantitative gated SPECT in patients with old myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
Does multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) accurately estimate regional and global cardiac function compared to left ventriculography in patients with old myocardial infarction?
Cross-Sectional (n=15)
No
Does multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) accurately estimate regional and global cardiac function compared to left ventriculography in patients with old myocardial infarction?
MDCT is more accurate than QGS for evaluating regional and global cardiac function compared to left ventriculography in patients with old myocardial infarction.
MDCT may accurately estimate cardiac function in old MI; leaves open routine adoption pending prospective validation.
Recently we can evaluate cardiac function by multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and quantitative gated SPECT(QGS) as well as left ventriculography (LVG). We evaluated regional and global cardiac function using MDCT and QGS, compared to LVG, and also evaluated parameters of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function using MDCT. Regional cardiac function was evaluated using shortening fraction(SF). Global cardiac function was evaluated using ejection fraction(EF). The peak filling rate(PFR) and the ratio of time to peak filling rate to RR interval(tPFR/RR) on MDCT were measured as parameters of LV diastolic function. The SFs by MDCT and LVG were correlated in almost each segment, but those by QGS and LVG were not correlated in some each segment. The SFs by QGS and LVG were not correlated in the myocardial infarcted segments, but those by QGS and LVG were correlated in the non-infarcted segments. Except for patients who had wall motion abnormalities at the ventricular septum or posterolateral wall, the EFs by MDCT and LVG were correlated, but those by QGS and LVG were not correlated. MDCT was more useful in detecting regional and global cardiac function compared to QGS, and parameters of LV diastolic function could be also measured by MDCT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaguchi et al. (2007) conducted a cross-sectional in Old myocardial infarction (n=15). Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) vs. Left ventriculography (LVG) and quantitative gated SPECT (QGS) was evaluated on Correlation of regional (shortening fraction) and global (ejection fraction) cardiac function with left ventriculography. Multidetector-row computed tomography accurately estimated regional and global cardiac function, showing better correlation with left ventriculography than quantitative gated SPECT in patients with old myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: