Key result
24-hour ambulatory and 7-day home blood pressure measurements demonstrated superior reproducibility (SD of differences 5.7/4.5 and 5.9/5.0 mm Hg) compared to office measurements (9.2/7.8 mm Hg).
Why the study?
To evaluate the reproducibility of office, ambulatory, and home blood pressure measurements in children and adolescents, and their implications for clinical practice and pediatric hypertension research.
Do 24-hour ambulatory and 7-day home blood pressure measurements provide superior reproducibility compared to office blood pressure measurements in children with suspected hypertension?
Observational (n=58)
Do 24-hour ambulatory and 7-day home blood pressure measurements provide superior reproducibility compared to office blood pressure measurements in children with suspected hypertension?
In children and adolescents, 24-hour ambulatory and 7-day home blood pressure monitoring offer superior reproducibility compared to office measurements, allowing for significantly smaller sample sizes in pediatric hypertension trials.
Reproducibility of pediatric BP measurements warrants caution in diagnosis; leaves open optimal protocols for hypertension research.
This study aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of office (OBP), ambulatory (ABP), and home blood pressure (HBP) measurements in children and adolescents, and their implications in diagnosing hypertension in clinical practice and in pediatric hypertension research. Apparently healthy children and adolescents referred for suspected hypertension were included. Measurements of 2-visit OBP, 7-day HBP, and 24-hour ABP were performed twice, 1 to 6 months apart. Reproducibility was quantified using the SD of differences between repeated measurements. The sample size of clinical trials comparing the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs using each method was calculated. Fifty-eight individuals were analyzed (mean age, 13.0±2.9 years, 60.3% boys). The reproducibility of 24-hour ABP (SD of differences 5.7/4.5 systolic/diastolic) and HBP (5.9/5.0 mm Hg) were comparable and superior to that of visit-2 OBP (9.2/7.8) and awake (6.7/5.5) or asleep ABP (7.6/6.1). As a consequence, a parallel-group comparative trial aiming to detect a difference in the effect of 2 drugs of 10 mm Hg systolic BP, would require 36 participants when using OBP measurements, 14 using 24-hour ABP, and 15 using HBP (102/34/42 respectively for detecting a 5 mm Hg difference in diastolic BP). For a crossover design trial, the corresponding sample sizes are 9/3/4 for systolic BP and 26/9/11 for diastolic, respectively. These data suggest that in children and adolescents 24-hour ABP and 7-day HBP have similar reproducibility, superior to OBP and daytime or asleep ABP. These findings have major implications in diagnosing hypertension in children in clinical practice and in designing clinical research trials in pediatric hypertension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stergiou et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Suspected hypertension (n=58). 24-hour ambulatory and 7-day home blood pressure measurements vs. Office blood pressure measurements was evaluated on Reproducibility (SD of differences between repeated measurements). 24-hour ambulatory and 7-day home blood pressure measurements demonstrated superior reproducibility (SD of differences 5.7/4.5 and 5.9/5.0 mm Hg) compared to office measurements (9.2/7.8 mm Hg).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: