What question did this study set out to answer?

To assess the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of a simplified Port-Access technique for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.

August 1, 1998European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic SurgeryOpen Access

Clinical experiences with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using a simplified port accessTM technique1

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Why the study?

Does minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using a simplified port access technique provide safe and effective outcomes in patients with mitral valve disease?

Population

29 patients with mitral valve disease.

Comparison

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using a… vs Conventional mitral valve surgery.

Design

Case_series

Follow-up

up to 3 months (for echocardiography)

Authors

VGVassilios GulielmosOnze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital MDMarkus DangelKrankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier NSNatalja SolowjowaHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Supports feasibility in small early series; leaves open comparative safety and stay reduction versus sternotomy in randomized trials.

Key Points

To assess the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of a simplified Port-Access technique for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery.
Intervention performed on 29 patients (aged 30–75 years, median 62.5 ± 11.0) with mitral regurgitation (n = 16), stenosis (n = 7), or combined disease (n = 6) between May 1996 and December 1997.
Access was achieved via a 5–7 cm right mini-thoracotomy with femoral cardiopulmonary bypass and an intraaortic balloon catheter for cardioplegia delivery, yielding 5 valve repairs and 24 valve replacements.
Zero mortality and no study-related complications occurred during the follow-up period, with no perivalvular leaks reported.
Transesophageal echocardiography at 3 months revealed only minor residual mitral regurgitation in 3 patients, with shorter hospital stays achieved in the last 10 consecutive cases.

Structured PICO

Does minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using a simplified port access technique provide safe and effective outcomes in patients with mitral valve disease?

Population

29 patients (13 male, 16 female, aged 30 to 75 years, median 62.5 +/- 11.0 years) with mitral valve disease (insufficiency n=16, stenosis n=7, combined n=6).

Intervention

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (repair n=5, replacement n=24) using a simplified Port-Access technique via small right thoracotomy (5-7 cm) with femoral cannulation and intraaortic balloon-catheter.

Comparator

Conventional mitral valve surgery (historical comparison for ventilation, ICU, and hospital stay).

Outcome

Mortality, perivalvular leak, residual mitral valve regurgitation, and postoperative study-related complications.safety

A simplified Port-Access technique for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is safe, effective, and may reduce hospital stay compared to conventional approaches.

Cite This Study

Gulielmos et al. (1998) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a75e2e41eaff9cba9162006 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(98)00149-3

Topics

Mitral valve intervention

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Clinical experiences with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using a simplified port accessTM technique1

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Topics

Clinical experiences with minimally invasive mitral valve surgery using a simplified port accessTM technique1

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Structured PICO

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Topics

Also Consider