Key result
Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve replacement in dogs yields excellent recovery of LV function.
Why the study?
Does minimally invasive port-access mitral valve replacement preserve myocardial function in a canine model?
Population
6 mongrel dogs
Comparison
Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve… vs Prebypass baseline values
Design
Preclinical
Follow-up
60 minutes after bypass
Authors
Loading...
Supports myocardial preservation in canine port-access MVR; leaves open translation to human clinical practice.
Does minimally invasive port-access mitral valve replacement preserve myocardial function in a canine model?
p-value: p=0.51
Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve replacement is technically feasible and preserves myocardial function in a canine model, supporting the initiation of clinical trials.
Schwartz et al. (1997) studied Mitral valve replacement (experimental model) (n=6). Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve replacement vs. Prebypass baseline was evaluated on Recovery of left ventricular function (elastance) (p=0.51). Minimally invasive port-access mitral valve replacement in dogs resulted in excellent recovery of left ventricular function at 60 minutes compared to prebypass baseline (elastance p=0.51).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: