Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) has the potential to be a specific, sensitive and quantitative diagnostic test for transplant rejection. To test this hypothesis, we evaluated F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose ([F]FDG) and N-labeled ammonia ([N]NH3) small animal PET imaging in a well-established murine cardiac rejection model. METHODS: Heterotopic transplants were performed using minor major histocompatibility complex-mismatched B6.C-H2 donor hearts in C57BL/6(H-2) recipients. C57BL/6 donor hearts into C57BL/6 recipients served as isograft controls. [F]FDG PET imaging was performed weekly between posttransplant days 7 and 42, and the percent injected dose was computed for each graft. [N]NH3 imaging was performed to evaluate myocardial perfusion. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in [F]FDG uptake in allografts from day 14 to day 21 (1.6% to 5.2%; P < 0.001) and uptake in allografts was significantly increased on posttransplant days 21 (5.2% vs 0.9%; P = 0.005) and 28 (4.8% vs 0.9%; P = 0.006) compared to isograft controls. Furthermore, [F]FDG uptake correlated with an increase in rejection grade within allografts between days 14 and 28 after transplantation. Finally, the uptake of [N]NH3 was significantly lower relative to the native heart in allografts with chronic vasculopathy compared to isograft controls on day 28 (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PET imaging with [F]FDG can be used after transplantation to monitor the evolution of rejection. Decreased uptake of [N]NH3 in rejecting allografts may be reflective of decreased myocardial blood flow. These data suggest that combined [F]FDG and [N]NH3 PET imaging could be used as a noninvasive, quantitative technique for serial monitoring of allograft rejection and has potential application in human transplant recipients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Daly et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: