Key result
Aichi virus was used as a model VP0 virus to test for conservation of function between VP0 and VP4 to better understand viral cell entry and membrane pore function.
Why the study?
It is unknown how picornaviruses lacking VP4, such as Aichi virus, rearrange their capsids and induce membrane permeability during cell entry.
VP4 pore formation details picornavirus entry; leaves open antiviral targeting or extension to other viruses.
To initiate infection, viruses must enter a host cell and deliver their genome into the appropriate location. The picornavirus family of small nonenveloped RNA viruses includes significant human and animal pathogens and is also a model to understand the process of cell entry. Most picornavirus capsids contain the internal protein VP4, generated from cleavage of a VP0 precursor. During entry, VP4 is released from the capsid. In enteroviruses this forms a membrane pore, which facilitates genome release into the cytoplasm. Due to high levels of sequence similarity, it is expected to play the same role for other picornaviruses. Some picornaviruses, such as Aichi virus, retain an intact VP0, and it is unknown how these viruses rearrange their capsids and induce membrane permeability in the absence of VP4. Here, we have used Aichi virus as a model VP0 virus to test for conservation of function between VP0 and VP4. This could enhance understanding of pore function and lead to development of novel therapeutic agents that block entry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelly et al. (2022) studied Picornavirus infection. Aichi virus was used as a model VP0 virus to test for conservation of function between VP0 and VP4 to better understand viral cell entry and membrane pore function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: