Key result
Among Malaysians with very high cardiovascular risk, 75.8% were not on lipid-lowering therapy and only 15.9% achieved their LDL-C treatment target.
Why the study?
Dyslipidaemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, prompting an evaluation of dyslipidaemia subtypes, lipid-lowering therapy use, and LDL-C target achievement among high-risk and very high-risk individuals in Malaysia.
Cross-Sectional (n=5,279)
Yes
There is a high prevalence of dyslipidemia and significant undertreatment with lipid-lowering therapies among high and very high cardiovascular risk individuals in Malaysia.
Highlights gaps in LDL-C target achievement among high-risk Malaysians; leaves open need for targeted LLT optimization strategies.
Dyslipidaemia is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. The aims of this study are to determine the prevalence of dyslipidaemia subtypes, the proportions of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) use, and the achievement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) treatment targets for high-risk (HR) and very high-risk (VHR) Malaysians. This cross-sectional study involves 5279 participants across 11 states in Malaysia. The data were obtained through a standardised questionnaire, anthropometric measurements, venous glucose and lipid profile. The participants with existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or diabetes with at least one of the other major risk factors (smoking, hypertension or dyslipidaemia) were grouped into the VHR category. Other participants were risk-categorised using the Framingham General CVD Risk Score (FRS-CVD). The prevalence of elevated LDL-C, LLT use and LDL-C target were set according to respective risk categories. Pearson's chi-squared test was used to test the difference in the proportions. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) age was 41.1 ± 14.8 years, and 62.2% (3283/5279) of the group were females. Within the participant group, 51.5% were found to have elevated total cholesterol, 28.8% had low HDL-C, and 33.8% had high triglyceride. As for elevated LDL-C, 9.8% were in VHR, 8.6% in HR, 5.8% in MR and 34.9% in LR categories. Among the VHR group, 75.8% were not on LLT, and only 15.9% achieved the LDL-C target. As for the HR category, 87.7% were not on LLT, and only 16.1% achieved the LDL-C target. Dyslipidaemia is highly prevalent among Malaysians. The majority of VHR and HR participants were not on LLT and did not achieve LDL-C treatment targets. Proactive programs are warranted to combat dyslipidaemia-associated CVD events in these groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Razman et al. (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Dyslipidaemia and Cardiovascular Risk (n=5,279). High and very high cardiovascular risk was evaluated on Achievement of LDL-C treatment targets and use of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Among Malaysians with very high cardiovascular risk, 75.8% were not on lipid-lowering therapy and only 15.9% achieved their LDL-C treatment target.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: