Why the study?
Does the ratio of urine and blood urea nitrogen concentration (UUN/BUN) predict the response to tolvaptan in decompensated heart failure patients?
Does the ratio of urine and blood urea nitrogen concentration (UUN/BUN) predict the response to tolvaptan in decompensated heart failure patients?
The UUN/BUN ratio is a useful clinical parameter to predict the diuretic and clinical response to tolvaptan in patients with decompensated heart failure.
May support UUN/BUN for tolvaptan response prediction in decompensated HF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
AIM: This study was conducted to evaluate the performance of the ratio of urine and blood urea nitrogen concentration (UUN/BUN) as a new predictive factor for the response of an arginine vasopressin receptor 2 antagonist tolvaptan (TLV) in decompensated heart failure patients. METHODS: This study enrolled 70 decompensated heart failure patients who were administered TLV at University of Tokyo Hospital. We collected the data of clinical parameters including UUN/BUN before administering TLV. Two different outcomes were defined as follows: having over 300 mL increase in urine volume on the first day (immediate urine output response) and having any decrease in body weight within one week after starting TLV treatment (subsequent clinical response). RESULTS: Among the 70 enrolled patients, 37 patients (52.9%) showed immediate urine output response; 51 patients (72.9%) showed a subsequent clinical response of body weight decrease. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis showed good prediction by UUN/BUN for the immediate response (AUC-ROC 0.86 [0.75-0.93]) and a significantly better prediction by UUN/BUN for the subsequent clinical response compared with urinary osmolality (AUC-ROC 0.78 [0.63-0.88] vs. 0.68 [0.52-0.80], P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that a clinical parameter of UUN/BUN can predict the response of TLV even when measured before TLV administration. UUN/BUN might enable identification of good responders for this new drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shimizu et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: