Why the study?
With laparoscopic cholecystectomy being common and surgeons adopting fast-track approaches, there was a need to develop a standard ERAS protocol to promote early recovery while maintaining standard of care.
Does a tailored ERAS program improve recovery and reduce length of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
Does a tailored ERAS program improve recovery and reduce length of hospital stay in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
Implementing a tailored ERAS protocol for laparoscopic cholecystectomy reduces hospital stay and improves patient satisfaction and pain tolerance.
Tailored ERAS may aid LC recovery in select settings; leaves open standardized benefits pending randomized trials.
Background: With the paradigm shift happening in perioperative care which is progressively towards better patient recovery in terms of speed & quality of patient comfort, ERAS has emerged as a method to achieve it. With LC being one of the most common surgical procedures with most surgeons adopting “FastTrack” approach in respect to it, it makes a strong case for developing a standard ERAS protocol for the same. Aims & Objectives: The purpose of this study was to implement a tailored ERAS program for elective LC in patients to promote early recovery while maintaining standard of care. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 156 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedure from August 2018 to December 2019- Data regarding length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction, pain score, PONV, SSI, readmissions, morbidity & mortality were collected. Results: Patients in mERAS group showed early recovery, shortened LOHS (mERAS=1.54 +/-0.14 Vs conventional=2.3+/-0.23) & better postoperative pain tolerance. Conclusion: Patients in enhanced recovery group showed better overall recovery and satisfaction in peri operative period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: