Why the study?
Do Niagara temporary and Opti-Flow long-term hemodialysis catheters provide effective blood flows and low recirculation rates?
Do Niagara temporary and Opti-Flow long-term hemodialysis catheters provide effective blood flows and low recirculation rates?
Both Niagara temporary and Opti-Flow long-term hemodialysis catheters provide effective blood flows above 400 mL/min with minimal recirculation when lines are not reversed.
Real blood flows (Qb in mL/min) and blood recirculation rates (R in %) were assessed using the ultrasound dilution technology (Transonic Systems Inc, Ithaca, NY, USA) in internal jugular and sub-clavian catheters inserted for chronic hemodialysis. A total of 14 Niagara temporary catheters and 17 Opti-Flow long-term catheters (both by Vas-Cath, distributed by Bard, Mississauga, Canada) were evaluated. Real Qb and R were measured for each catheter at set Qb of 250 (not shown), 300, 350, 400, and 450 mL/min, as indicated by the dialysis machines and under 0 ultrafiltration. Arterial and venous pressures (PA and PV in mmHg) were recorded with each measure (not shown). There were 13 Niagara® catheters with non-reversed lines, 1 with reversed lines, and 12 Opti-Flow® catheters with non-reversed lines, and 5 with reversed lines at the time of measurements. Only 2 Niagara® and 4 Opti-Flow® with non-reversed lines showed evidence of R; R was found in all catheters with reversed lines. Results are shown as mean ± SD:TableWe conclude that both types of catheters provide effective Qb above 400 mL/min with absent or low R for the majority. R seems higher in Opti-Flow® with reversed lines. When it occurs, R can not be predicted by significantly altered PA and PV (not shown), and Qb is maintained.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amyot et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: