Key result
During hemodialysis, access flow measured by ultrasound dilution decreased by 132 +/- 137 ml/m (p < 0.05), alongside modest decreases in cardiac output and mean arterial pressure.
Why the study?
Does access flow change during hemodialysis in patients undergoing the procedure?
Observational (n=19)
Does access flow change during hemodialysis in patients undergoing the procedure?
Access flow, cardiac output, and mean arterial pressure decrease modestly during hemodialysis, with small positive correlations between these hemodynamic parameters.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Access flow reductions during hemodialysis associate with hemodynamic shifts; hypothesis-generating for surveillance protocols, requiring prospective validation before practice change.
Hemodialysis accesses must supply adequate blood flow to perform hemodialysis and maintain access patency. Access flow (QA) is not measured routinely during hemodialysis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether access flow changes during hemodialysis and to determine which factors correlate with QA. The authors measured hemodialysis access flow by ultrasound dilution (QA-T) (Transonic HD01 hemodialysis monitor; Transonic Systems, Inc., Ithaca, NY) and duplex ultrasound, with time-domain correlation (QA-S) (Philips CVI Phillips Medical Systems, Santa Ana, CA) hourly, in 19 patients during hemodialysis. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) (Fresenius automated blood pressure cuff) and cardiac output (CO) (Transonic hemodialysis monitor; Transonic Systems, Inc.) also were measured sequentially. Using duplex ultrasound, access flow was unchanged. However, it fell 132 +/- 137 ml/m (p < 0.05) by ultrasound dilution in hr 4. Cardiac output fell 586 +/- 840 ml/ m (p < 0.05), and MAP fell 11.9 +/- 13.0 mmHg (p < 0.01). There were small positive correlations between CO and QA (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.32, QA-T; r = 0.27, QA-S; p < 0.05), and between CO and MAP (r = 0.35; p < 0.01). In conclusion, access flow, CO, and MAP decreased modestly during hemodialysis. Further studies are necessary to see if access flow is similar off dialysis, and whether in-line access flow measurements can decrease access thrombosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sands et al. (1996) conducted an observational in Hemodialysis (n=19). Hemodialysis was evaluated on Change in access flow (QA) during hemodialysis (p=< 0.05). During hemodialysis, access flow measured by ultrasound dilution decreased by 132 +/- 137 ml/m (p < 0.05), alongside modest decreases in cardiac output and mean arterial pressure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: