Why the study?
Innovations in permanent pacemaker implantation are needed to improve procedural effectiveness, device longevity, patient outcomes, and potentially reduce complication rates.
Does the trans-axillary approach reduce implantation time and complications compared to the conventional approach in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation?
Does the trans-axillary approach reduce implantation time and complications compared to the conventional approach in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation?
The trans-axillary approach for permanent pacemaker implantation significantly reduces procedural time and complications such as pneumothorax and lead erosion compared to conventional methods.
New PPM technique should not yet change practice; leaves open confirmation of benefit in randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Permanent pacemakers' (PPM) implantation is an integral part of electrophysiology and general cardiology. The implantation technique has evolved a lot since the first implantation. Several innovations have been undertaken to improve the effectiveness, life of the transplant, and patient outcomes. In this study, we introduced a new implantation technique to improve the procedure and possibly reduce the rate of complication. METHODS: This study was conducted from January 2016 to February 2017 in Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Patients destined for implantation of PPM based on a clinical treatment plan, after proper explanation of the procedure, were brought to the catheterization laboratory. Venogram of the upper limb performed. Patients were scrubbed and draped. The axillary vein was approached via the Seldinger technique. About 2 to 3 cm superolateral to the puncture site, a skin incision was made and subcutaneous pocket constructed, and a guidewire external end was pulled in from inside the pocket keeping the venous end at the place. Subsequently, in a routine way, lead was placed, secured and the wound was closed in layers. RESULTS: A total of 690 PPM were implanted under the study. About 290 devices were implanted in the conventional way and 380 devices via the trans-axillary approach. The mean implantation time was less than 30 minutes via the trans-axillary approach. Immediate and delayed complications of the procedure were minimal. CONCLUSION: Trans-axillary approach holds some significant advantages over the conventional technique. The subcutaneous pocket and venous puncture successfully reduce the burden of foreign material, minimize the tension on the wound, shorten implantation time and reduce the chances of erosion of the device.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shah et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: