Why the study?
Smartphone sensors enable cardiorespiratory monitoring, but their role compared to traditional medical tools needed evaluation.
Does smart technology accurately measure cardiorespiratory parameters compared to traditional methods in adult patients with chest diseases?
Does smart technology accurately measure cardiorespiratory parameters compared to traditional methods in adult patients with chest diseases?
Smart technology shows a significant positive correlation with traditional cardiorespiratory monitoring tools, suggesting potential utility despite some differences in absolute measurements.
Smartphone-based monitoring may enable accessible cardiorespiratory assessment; leaves open accuracy and clinical utility pending rigorous validation.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zamzam et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: