Why the study?
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve NT-proBNP, left atrial volume, and NYHA class independently of systolic blood pressure reduction compared to valsartan in patients with HFpEF?
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve NT-proBNP, left atrial volume, and NYHA class independently of systolic blood pressure reduction compared to valsartan in patients with HFpEF?
The beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan on NT-proBNP, left atrial volume, and functional class in HFpEF are independent of its blood pressure-lowering effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports sacubitril/valsartan in HFpEF beyond BP reduction; confirms NT-proBNP effects independent of systolic BP change.
AIMS: The first in class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, LCZ696 has been shown to reduce levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), reduce left atrial size and improve New York Heart Association (NYHA) class in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We examined whether the effects of LCZ696 were independent of systolic blood pressure (SBP) lowering. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the Prospective comparison of ARNi (angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor) with ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker) on Management Of heart failUre with preserved ejectioN fracTion (PARAMOUNT) trial 301 patients were randomly assigned to LCZ696 or valsartan. We examined the relationship between SBP lowering and LCZ696 on NT-proBNP level, left atrial size, NYHA class and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). By 12 weeks blood pressure was reduced by 9 mmHg (SD 15)/5 mmHg (SD 11) in patients receiving LCZ696 in comparison with 3 mmHg (SD 17)/2 mmHg (SD 12) in those receiving valsartan. The change in NT-proBNP was poorly correlated with change in SBP (LCZ696, r = 0.17, P = 0.06; valsartan, r = 0.05, P = 0.58) After adjustment for change in SBP, the ratio of change in NT-proBNP at 12 weeks for LCZ696 vs. valsartan was 0.76 (95% CI 0.63-0.93, P = 0.008), and similar to the ratio not adjusting for SBP (0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.92, P = 0.006); P for interaction was 0.38). Similarly, reduction in left atrial volume index at 36 weeks, improvement in NYHA class and eGFR were all independent of the change in SBP. CONCLUSION: In patients with HFpEF, the effect of the angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 on NT-proBNP, left atrial volume, functional class, and eGFR was independent of reduction in SBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jhund et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: