Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Human-engineered “gray” infrastructure (e.g., artificial reservoirs) and ecosystem-based “green” infrastructure (e.g., forests) both provide essential water storage capacities to buffer hydrological variability under rising climate uncertainty. However, a quantitative assessment of gray ( S gray ) and green ( S green ) water storage capacities across global major river basins remains lacking. In this study, we estimate ecosystems’ root zone storage capacity as a proxy for S green using the mass curve technique. Combined with artificial reservoir storage capacities, our results showed that S gray and S green exhibit highly spatial heterogeneity, with the largest volumetric S gray in Yenisei (459 km 3 ) and S green in Amazon (1427 km 3 ). Over the period 1959–2020, S gray experienced a consistent increase, while S green exhibited fluctuations. Notably, in 12 % of the global major river basin area (1.3 × 10 7 km 2 ), including the Colorado, Yenisei, and Yangtze, indicating that human-engineered regulation of hydrology has become more influential than terrestrial ecosystem in these regions. These gray dominated basins are also projected to experience a decline in S green , suggesting the potential need to protect and enhance green infrastructure. This study provides a scientific basis for the integrated management of gray and green infrastructures, offering insights to enhance the resilience and sustainability of water resources at the basin scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: